Skip to main content

Why Your Cancer Cells Would Like Some Diet Soda, Too

Cancer cells get a kick out of the aspartame in diet soda, just as we do. It stimulates their growth and mobility, scientific research tells us.(1)

And since there's a lag time of 8-10 years between the start of any cancer and the time when it can be detected by medical screening procedures, it is wise not to be feeding undiscovered cancer cells something that promotes their growth during that time, wouldn't you agree?

While we are led to believe we are avoiding weight gain by choosing a diet soda or sugar-free energy drink, did you know these drinks still promote obesity? It's true.

Diet Soda Isn't All You Have To Watch Out For...

In fact, most American fast foods are loaded with chemicals that not only stimulate the growth of our bellies, but also increase the growth of tumors, the prevalence of sudden cardiac death, and long-term brain damage in children and adults.

With diet soda and fast food, we get way more than we bargained for!

If you learned what these food additives in diet pop and fast food meals were doing to your innards, you would hardly call them "Happy".

Would it bother you to know that these same ingredients are linked to ADD and lower IQ in your children?

I wish I was making all this up, but I'm not. All these findings are reported in prestigious medical peer-reviewed journals for you to read, if you know where to look.

Your daily newspaper won't tell you how much danger lies in the foods they advertise, because 1) they don't know; and 2) the food processors are one of their biggest sources of advertising revenue.

But Soy Foods Are Healthy, Right?

Processed soy foods -- often viewed by health-conscious consumers as a good alternative to meat and dairy protein -- are prime sources of these neurotoxins. So, by trying to do "the right thing" with our diet, we end up causing unexpected damage to ourselves and our children.

It is possible to avoid most of these toxins in our food supply, but the key is Knowledge. But, with all the intentional misinformation put out by food processors, it is difficult to find the truth, which is buried in hard-to-decipher medical research reports.

Of all the sources of cancer, the genetic damage certain food additives do is the least suspected. After all, they were approved by the FDA, weren't they?

Well, there's an interesting history behind aspartame, in particular.

You remember Donald Rumsfeld, the former Secretary of Defense who helped get the U.S. into the Iraq War? We also have him to thank for pushing through the approval of aspartame when he was CEO of G.D. Searle Pharmaceuticals, the inventors of aspartame.

What A Coincidence!

It is very handy to employ an executive with political connections who shrugs off unintended consequences of his actions by simply saying, "Stuff happens".

Well, when that stuff is happening to you and your children, it might be worth learning what you can do to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Diet soda with aspartame is one product that gives you much more than you bargained for.

(1) Excitotoxins -- The Taste That Kills by Russell Blaylock, MD

For more information documenting the dangers posed by aspartame, MSG, and other food additives, grab a copy of an interview with noted brain surgeon and expert on the subject at Diet Soda


View the original article here

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis: Life saving lung cancer test to set off cost debate

By Bill Berkrot NEW YORK | Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:07pm EDT NEW YORK (Reuters) - A landmark study showing that routine lung screening of heavy smokers and former smokers using low dose CT scans could save thousands of lives is sure to set off a fierce debate about the cost of such testing on an overburdened healthcare system. The U.S. National Cancer Institute studied more than 53,000 people between the ages of 55 and 74 deemed at high risk of developing lung cancer. It found that screening with the three-dimensional X-rays cut deaths by 20 percent. Details of the study and a discussion of its implications were published on Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, lending additional weight to initial findings that were released in November. The discussion noted that radiologists using more advanced CT equipment than was available for the study could lead to an even larger reduction in lung cancer deaths. At the same time, the potential for many more false positive results could ri...

Who should get a CT scan to screen for lung cancer?

By Jenifer Goodwin HealthDay Reporter THURSDAY, June 30 (HealthDay News) -- Annual low-dose CT scans cut the death rate from lung cancer by 20% in heavy smokers and formerly heavy smokers, compared to those who get annual chest X-rays, according to the results of a major National Cancer Institute study released on Wednesday. Experts are calling the findings a major advance in efforts to combat lung cancer deaths. By catching the cancer early, the tumors can be removed surgically -- hopefully before they've spread and become very difficult to cure. "This is a momentous time in the history of public health research," said Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. "The NLST [National Lung Screening Trial] is the best-designed and best-performed lung cancer screening study in history." Yet the findings raise as many questions as they answer, said Dr. Harold Sox, a professor emeritus of medicine at Dartmouth Medical School who wrote an...

What is Lung Cancer - Incidence, Signs, Symptoms, Causation, Prognosis and Treatment

INTRODUCTION Lung cancer may also be the most tragic cancer because in most cases, it might have been prevented, 87% of lung cancer cases are caused by smoking. Lung cancer has long been the most common cause of cancer death in men and since 1987 it has also become the most common cause of cancer death in women. Lung cancer is the second most commonly occurring form of cancer in most western countries and although the lung cancer incidence is less common in developing countries, the rapid increase in the popularity of smoking will see the number of lung cancer sufferers in those countries quickly catch up with the western world. Lung cancers can arise in any part of the lung, and 90%-95% of cancers of the lung are thought to arise from the epithelial, or lining cells of the larger and smaller airways (bronchi and bronchioles); for this reason, lung cancers are sometimes called bronchogenic carcinomas or bronchogenic cancers. The most common type of lung cancers are epidermoid carcinoma...