Skip to main content

Why Is the Wireless Industry Not Taking Responsibility for the Coming Pandemic?

Let's get something straight right from the get go.

I am not trying to advocate for the dismantling of the wireless industry globally. Heaven knows if this was to happen the havoc it would wreck on the global economy would be devastating. You should know that the wireless industry, and that includes manufacturers, wireless providers, the ones that sell you the services and accessory resellers, make up an industry that on a worldwide scale is second in annual revenue to only the automotive sector. So we are talking about an industry behemoth!

So perhaps this is the reason why this industry itself has been so sheepish about discussing and addressing the concerns of medical professionals, researchers and scientists, who are all sounding the alarm regarding health concerns because of constant exposure to electro magnetic radiation, the stuff that is given off by anything that is electric.

Where cell phones and cordless phones are concerned the products we are using today are more powerful than the products of five, ten and fifteen years ago,and we hold them right against our head or carry them strapped to our body. A lot of the lack of concern is because many of the past studies were based on these underpowered devices and there was no real threat then. Studies conducted over the past 5 years combined with the more than 170 studies accumulated over the past fifteen years are all pointing in one direction and that is that there is now consensus among the medical community that this exposure is not a good thing especially where children are involved.

I believe that although there is conclusive medical evidence to confirm a link between the rising incidence of rare forms of brain cancers, especially those growing behind the ear of cell phone users, no one wants to sound the alarm for fear of destroying a massive industry.

What should be happening is for the industry to show some leadership and take some responsibility for educating consumers about how to use the technology in a safer fashion. Of particular note, people under the age of twenty, especially children are at a higher risk for all of the associated maladies for a couple of reasons. We know that the brain and the skull of a human does not fully mature till we reach our early twenties. Brain tissue in children is more porous and as a result any radiation that children are exposed to, travels deeper into the brain tissue.

Remember, our bodies are made up of mostly water. Cell and cordless phones operate on the same frequency of microwave energy that we use to cook our food so in essence when we talk for prolonged periods of time we are actually slow cooking our tissue. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this is not a good thing.

At the very least the manufacturers as well as the wireless providers should be providing a safe usage guide to all consumers. The most you will see right now for example is a little foot note from Apple and Blackberry instructing users to hold their phones in a certain way when placing them near the ear. This is their solution. It makes me angry that they can get away with stuff like this.

Also you should know that in North America, the CTIA, the industry association for wireless providers has blocked every attempt by the government to force the manufacturers and wireless providers to list the S.A.R. (specific absorption rate) rating of each phone. Every wireless device gives off radiation. The S.A.R. rating tells what this dose of radiation is and in North America the S.A.R. rating cannot exceed 1.6 w. Not only does the new Apple iPhone 4 surpass this rating, they are not even willing to make this information public.

Let me expand on this..if you look at the safety guide section of the manual that comes with the iPhone 4 they do list the SAR ratings that are under 1.6w. If you read closely and examine their testing protocol you will understand that when they take the measurement they position the phone 25 mm away from the ear..that is about an inch..I don't know about you but I don't know anyone that holds their phone this way when they put it to their ear. If anything they push it right up against the ear to hear more clearly.

It is quite obvious that Apple and other manufacturers test their phones this way because it allows them to get a lower SAR rating. But as you can see, this rating is not accurate. The other point of note here is that the testing standards as laid out by the government here in Canada haven't been upgraded since 1999.

The wireless and cordless devices of today are very different in terms of power than they were almost 12 years ago.

What is going on?

In other parts of the world like Finland and Israel for example it is mandated by law that S.A.R. ratings must be public knowledge. and posted on product boxes and at wireless locations so consumers can make an informed decision when purchasing products and services.

And so it goes...the devices get more complex and they get more powerful, exposing all of us and especially our children who are increasingly using these devices at a younger age, to the harmful effects of radiation.

Just when is this madness going to stop?

How many people are already sick, will get sick and will die?

What are we waiting for?

It all comes down to money.


View the original article here

Popular posts from this blog

Lung cancer survival rate - Stage 2 lung cancer

When a person looks for a medical professional about the stage 2 lung cancer, one of the first questions that come to mind is: what is my lung cancer survival rate? This is largely influenced by the medical records showing that lung cancer is one of the lowest chances of survival of cancers in the world. One must realize that these statistics are only numbers and a variety of factors that can affect your chances of being cured. The lung cancer survival rate is affected by several variables. One such variable is age. Younger people tend to have a greater chance of survival for people over 50. This is due to the strong natural defenses younger than the older. Medical records also indicate that women with lung cancer in stage 2 have a greater ability to be cured of their male counterparts the parties. The spread of malignant tumor is a very important factor in determining the survival of lung cancer exchange rate. The tumors may spread from the lung tissu...

Analysis: Life saving lung cancer test to set off cost debate

By Bill Berkrot NEW YORK | Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:07pm EDT NEW YORK (Reuters) - A landmark study showing that routine lung screening of heavy smokers and former smokers using low dose CT scans could save thousands of lives is sure to set off a fierce debate about the cost of such testing on an overburdened healthcare system. The U.S. National Cancer Institute studied more than 53,000 people between the ages of 55 and 74 deemed at high risk of developing lung cancer. It found that screening with the three-dimensional X-rays cut deaths by 20 percent. Details of the study and a discussion of its implications were published on Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, lending additional weight to initial findings that were released in November. The discussion noted that radiologists using more advanced CT equipment than was available for the study could lead to an even larger reduction in lung cancer deaths. At the same time, the potential for many more false positive results could ri...

What is Lung Cancer - Incidence, Signs, Symptoms, Causation, Prognosis and Treatment

INTRODUCTION Lung cancer may also be the most tragic cancer because in most cases, it might have been prevented, 87% of lung cancer cases are caused by smoking. Lung cancer has long been the most common cause of cancer death in men and since 1987 it has also become the most common cause of cancer death in women. Lung cancer is the second most commonly occurring form of cancer in most western countries and although the lung cancer incidence is less common in developing countries, the rapid increase in the popularity of smoking will see the number of lung cancer sufferers in those countries quickly catch up with the western world. Lung cancers can arise in any part of the lung, and 90%-95% of cancers of the lung are thought to arise from the epithelial, or lining cells of the larger and smaller airways (bronchi and bronchioles); for this reason, lung cancers are sometimes called bronchogenic carcinomas or bronchogenic cancers. The most common type of lung cancers are epidermoid carcinoma...